공격화행의 양면성 대조 연구: 가족 담화와 토론 담화를 중심으로

초록

The purpose of this study is to find out two aspects of aggressive speech acts; one is general features to attack other’s face in order to achieve one’s own conversation goals and the other is social features to achieve partial communication in the interest of pursuing in-group’s goals. Firstly, the focus of analyses is laid on finding three types of acts, rebuttal, threatening, and disparaging, by analyzing illocutionary forces of aggressive speech acts in family and debate discourses. Secondly, this study evaluates behavioral qualities that would compose each speech act itself with respect of intention, belief, and face. As for the conflict discourses of family members, rebuttal, threatening, or disparaging acts are analyzed to take such values as [+intention, -inter-belief, +self-face]. In contrast, as for the conflict discourses of debate participants, three types of acts are analyzed to take such values as [+intention, +inter-belief, +self-face, +group-face]. In conclusion, while three types of speech acts in family discourses illustrate the general features of aggressive speeches, those in debate discourses demonstrate some social features (Habermas, 1984, 1998).

키워드