Prioritising the Experimental Procedures for Mode I Fracture Toughness Using Fuzzy Group Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods

초록

Mode I fracture toughness is the most common amongst the three fracture modes because of its applications in rocks/materials engineering. There are different experimental methods that are available for its measurements and the selection of the available procedures to be used is usually a difficult task and highly multi criteria in nature. Therefore, this study proposed novel applications of two fuzzy-based multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for prioritising the experimental procedures. Thirteen different experimental methods were identified and evaluated under three different criteria by the experts. The weights were computed using both expert-assigned weights to each criterion and the fuzzy intuitionistic entropy measure obtained weights. This study reveals that ISRM-suggested cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc method is the most preferred follow by the semi-circular bend specimen and Brazilian disc method. The Pearson's correlation between the models is very strong ((>) 0.9), indicating that either of the two proposed approaches is suitable for this purpose. The sensitivity analysis was conducted by generating twenty-one sets of weights and the outcome ranked ISRM-suggested cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc, the most suitable follow by semi-circular bend specimen and Brazilian disc methods. The correlations amongst the MCDM methods for the sensitivity analysis are also very strong as previously observed. This study shows that the proposed models are suitable in prioritising the most appropriate experimental procedures for mode I fracture toughness.

키워드