Comparison of Resuscitation Outcomes Between 2-or 3-Stacked Defibrillation Strategies With Minimally Interrupted Chest Compression and the Single Defibrillation Strategy: A Swine Cardiac Arrest Model

  • Kim, Soyeong; 
  • Jung, Woo Jin; 
  • Roh, Young Il; 
  • Kim, Tae Youn; 
  • Hwang, Sung Oh; 
  • 외 1명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

4
Citations

SCOPUS

8

초록

Background There is controversy over whether the number and mode of electrical shock are optimal for successful defibrillation. Methods and Results Fifty-four pigs were randomly assigned to 3 groups. After inducing ventricular fibrillation and a 2-minute downtime, basic life support was initiated with a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio for 8 minutes. Subsequently, 20 minutes of advanced life support, including asynchronous ventilation, every 10 chest compressions with 15 L/min of oxygen, was delivered. Animals of the single shock group received a single shock, animals of the 2-stacked shock group received 2 consecutive shocks, and animals of the 3-stacked shock group received 3 consecutive shocks. Animals with the return of spontaneous circulation underwent post-cardiac arrest care for 12 hours. The rates of successful defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, and 48-hour survival and neurological deficit score were compared between the groups. Hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gas profiles, troponin I, and cardiac output were not different between the groups. There was a significant difference in chest compression fraction between the single and 3-stacked shock groups (P<0.001), although there was no difference between the single and 2-stacked shock groups (P=0.022) or the 2-stacked and 3-stacked shock groups (P=0.040). The rates of successful defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, and 48-hour survival were higher in the 2- and 3-stacked shock groups than in the single shock group (P=0.021, P=0.015, and P=0.021, respectively). Neurological deficit score at 48 hours was not different between the groups. Conclusions A stacked shock strategy was superior to a single shock strategy for successful defibrillation and better resuscitation outcomes in treating ventricular fibrillation.

키워드

cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; chest compression; defibrillation; outcomes; REFRACTORY VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; SEQUENTIAL EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; COUNCIL GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; MULTICENTER; RHYTHM
제목
Comparison of Resuscitation Outcomes Between 2-or 3-Stacked Defibrillation Strategies With Minimally Interrupted Chest Compression and the Single Defibrillation Strategy: A Swine Cardiac Arrest Model
저자
Kim, Soyeong; Jung, Woo Jin; Roh, Young Il; Kim, Tae Youn; Hwang, Sung Oh; Cha, Kyoung-Chul
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.121.021250
발행일
2021-09-21
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of the American Heart Association
권
10
호
18