Angiographic Severity of the Nonculprit Lesion and the Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Patients With AMI: FRAME-AMI Substudy

  • Seung, Jaeho
  • Choo, Eun Ho
  • Kim, Chan Joon
  • Kim, Hyun Kuk
  • Park, Keun Ho
  • ... Park, Sang Don
  • 외 24명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

4
Citations

SCOPUS

4

초록

BACKGROUND: The benefit of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for noninfarct-related artery (IRA) lesions with angiographically severe stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction is unclear.METHODS: Among 562 patients from the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infraction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) who were randomly allocated into either FFR-guided or angiography-guided PCI for non-IRA lesions, the current study evaluated the relationship between non-IRA stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the efficacy of FFR-guided PCI. The incidence of the primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) was compared between FFR- and angiography-guided PCI according to non-IRA stenosis severity (QCA stenosis >= 70% or <70%).RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were assigned to FFR-guided (n=284) versus angiography-guided PCI (n=278). At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the primary end point occurred in 14 of 181 patients with FFR-guided PCI and 31 of 197 patients with angiography-guided PCI among patients with QCA stenosis >= 70% (8.5% versus 19.2%; hazard ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.80]; P=0.008), while occurred in 4 of 103 patients with FFR-guided PCI and 9 of 81 patients with angiography-guided PCI among those with QCA stenosis <70% (3.9% versus 11.1%; P=0.315). There was no significant interaction between treatment strategy and non-IRA stenosis severity (P for interaction=0.636). FFR-guided PCI was associated with the reduction of death and myocardial infarction in both patients with QCA stenosis >= 70% (6.7% versus 15.1%; P=0.008) and those with QCA stenosis <70% (1.0% versus 9.6%; P=0.042) compared with angiography-guided PCI.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, FFR-guided PCI tended to have a lower risk of primary end point than angiography-guided PCI regardless of non-IRA stenosis severity without significant interaction.REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02715518.

키워드

coronary angiographydrug-eluting stentsmyocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary interventionprognosisPERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTIONAMERICAN-COLLEGERANDOMIZED-TRIALARTERY-DISEASEANGIOPLASTYGUIDELINESPROGNOSISSTENOSISSTEMI
제목
Angiographic Severity of the Nonculprit Lesion and the Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Patients With AMI: FRAME-AMI Substudy
저자
Seung, JaehoChoo, Eun HoKim, Chan JoonKim, Hyun KukPark, Keun HoLee, Seung HunKim, Min ChulHong, Young JoonAhn, Sung GyunDoh, Joon-HyungLee, Sang YeubPark, Sang DonLee, Hyun-JongKang, Min GyuKoh, Jin-SinCho, Yun-KyeongNam, Chang-WookKoo, Bon-KwonLee, Bong-KiYun, Kyeong HoHong, DavidJoh, Hyun SungChoi, Ki HongPark, Taek KyuLee, Joo MyungYang, Jeong HoonSong, Young BinChoi, Seung-HyukGwon, Hyeon-CheolHahn, Joo-Yong
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013611
발행일
2024-01
유형
Article
저널명
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
17
1