A comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Likert Scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes

  • Heo, Cindy Yoonjoung
  • Kim, Bona
  • Park, Kwangsoo
  • Back, Robin M.
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

69
Citations

SCOPUS

85

초록

Surveys based on Likert scales continue to dominate market research practice despite their limitations. Several researchers have suggested adopting different types of scales and a unique alternative for rating the importance level of several attributes is Best - Worst Scaling (BWS). The purpose of this study is to compare two scaling approaches, the Best-Worst Scale (BWS) and the Likert Scale to explore their advantages and disadvantages. This study tried to identify the relative importance of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) accommodation attributes using the aforementioned two scaling approaches. A comparison of the results found that the BWS approach helps to validate priorities from a customer perspective by achieving better discrimination among attributes, while the Likert scale approach is useful for comparing group differences such as gender differences.

키워드

Best-Worst scalingLikert scaleScale comparisonP2P accommodation attributesMARKETING-RESEARCHSHARING ECONOMYMECHANICAL TURKCHOICEPAYPARTICIPANTSCONJOINTSETS
제목
A comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Likert Scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes
저자
Heo, Cindy YoonjoungKim, BonaPark, KwangsooBack, Robin M.
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.064
발행일
2022-09
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Business Research
148
페이지
368 ~ 377